As Bonds COLLAPSE, US BEGS China to BUY ENERGY & Save Americans
リアクション
2026年09月20日
As Bonds COLLAPSE, US BEGS China to BUY ENERGY & Save Americans
What happens when the world’s most important bond market starts flashing warning signals at the exact moment America needs cheap money the most? And what if the biggest problem isn’t just rising Treasury yields — but the fact that Washington may need Beijing’s cooperation to prevent the pressure from getting much worse?
That is the question investors, homeowners, businesses, and governments around the world should be asking right now.
Because the U.S. Treasury market has just delivered another major warning.
The 10-year Treasury yield recently climbed above 5%, reaching about 5.04%, its highest level since 2007. And at the same time, 30-year mortgage rates have moved back toward 7.2%, putting renewed pressure on American households.
But here is where this story gets much more interesting.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has been defending the government's bond-buyback strategy, even as yields moved higher.
And that creates a fascinating question:
If Washington is actively trying to support the Treasury market, why are borrowing costs still climbing?
Stay with me, because by the end of this video, we are going to connect the bond market, oil prices, inflation, Federal Reserve policy, America's debt burden, and the upcoming Trump-Xi meeting into one much bigger picture.
And if you want more analysis connecting the world's biggest economic and geopolitical developments, make sure you subscribe to Global Power Watch.
Because this story is not simply about bonds.
It is about who has leverage in the global financial system.
The Treasury Problem Is Much Bigger Than One Interest Rate
Let's start with what actually happened.
In August, the U.S. Treasury announced that it would increase the size of its longer-term bond buyback operations. Beginning September 9, the Treasury said the maximum size of certain buyback operations would rise from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation, with the goal of providing additional liquidity to longer-dated Treasury markets.
Then came the congressional confrontation.
On September 15, Representative Jim Himes questioned Bessent about the intervention.
His argument was straightforward.
The Treasury had spent more than $10 billion, according to the exchange, attempting to support the market. When the intervention began, the 10-year yield was around 4.8%.
But afterward, the yield climbed roughly 20 basis points and reached approximately 5.04%.
So Himes asked the obvious question:
Was the intervention successful?
Bessent said yes.
His explanation was based on the counterfactual — essentially, what might have happened without the intervention — and he pointed to strong Treasury auctions as evidence that the operation had achieved its objective.
What happens when the world’s most important bond market starts flashing warning signals at the exact moment America needs cheap money the most? And what if the biggest problem isn’t just rising Treasury yields — but the fact that Washington may need Beijing’s cooperation to prevent the pressure from getting much worse?
That is the question investors, homeowners, businesses, and governments around the world should be asking right now.
Because the U.S. Treasury market has just delivered another major warning.
The 10-year Treasury yield recently climbed above 5%, reaching about 5.04%, its highest level since 2007. And at the same time, 30-year mortgage rates have moved back toward 7.2%, putting renewed pressure on American households.
But here is where this story gets much more interesting.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has been defending the government's bond-buyback strategy, even as yields moved higher.
And that creates a fascinating question:
If Washington is actively trying to support the Treasury market, why are borrowing costs still climbing?
Stay with me, because by the end of this video, we are going to connect the bond market, oil prices, inflation, Federal Reserve policy, America's debt burden, and the upcoming Trump-Xi meeting into one much bigger picture.
And if you want more analysis connecting the world's biggest economic and geopolitical developments, make sure you subscribe to Global Power Watch.
Because this story is not simply about bonds.
It is about who has leverage in the global financial system.
The Treasury Problem Is Much Bigger Than One Interest Rate
Let's start with what actually happened.
In August, the U.S. Treasury announced that it would increase the size of its longer-term bond buyback operations. Beginning September 9, the Treasury said the maximum size of certain buyback operations would rise from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation, with the goal of providing additional liquidity to longer-dated Treasury markets.
Then came the congressional confrontation.
On September 15, Representative Jim Himes questioned Bessent about the intervention.
His argument was straightforward.
The Treasury had spent more than $10 billion, according to the exchange, attempting to support the market. When the intervention began, the 10-year yield was around 4.8%.
But afterward, the yield climbed roughly 20 basis points and reached approximately 5.04%.
So Himes asked the obvious question:
Was the intervention successful?
Bessent said yes.
His explanation was based on the counterfactual — essentially, what might have happened without the intervention — and he pointed to strong Treasury auctions as evidence that the operation had achieved its objective.
